So, I can tell I’m getting older. I used to scoff at all sorts of ideas that I thought were simply way too lax (P/nP grading, redos, singing on neutral syllables, journals). As I accrue gray hairs, I’ve adopted many of these formerly uncomfortable ideas–with my own twists, of course–because I think (I know!) they effectively forward my course goals. So, this semester I tried another scoff-able idea. Co-writing the final exam with my students. I know this is hardly a new idea, but it’s the first time I’ve been brave (or stupid) enough to try.
- the exam will be too easy;
- no one will need to study;
- some people will earn higher grades than they really should, especially unfortunate if it ends up impacting their course grade;
- class time could be better spent on review and answering questions; and
- a few voices will control the entire exam.
- The exam was fine. It absolutely tested what I wanted it to test.
- The people who needed to study did. And what studying happened was definitely directed toward what the exam was testing.
- A few people earned grades that were pleasantly surprising to me. A few people earned grades that were unpleasantly surprising to me. This situation strikes me as no different from any other semester. The pleasant surprises often were directly related to someone trying really hard for a stretch (but possible) grade.
- I was extremely happy with how we used that class time (described below)
- And the way we handled class time guaranteed that all voices took the opportunity to contribute to the exam.
Here’s how it all got set up:
In the last week of classes, we put together the review sheet in about 15 minutes on Monday. We divided the sheet into two lists: Content and Skills. Students took the lead on the Content part; I took the lead on the Skills part. Here’s our review sheet.
On Tuesday, I gave them the typed up version.
On Wednesday, I saved a few minutes for questions, but there weren’t many. And we did course evaluations.
On Thursday, our final day, we were supposed to have our normal Thursday quiz. I forgot to write it (DOH). I had them put themselves into small groups and come up with exam questions based on the SKILLS page of the review sheet. After 7 minutes, we reconvened and started to write the exam together (yay Elmo projector). After an individual contributed, I gave them the final handout for the class (a reminder of redo policies, 3 final sessions of office hours, and yet another reminder of the exam time and place). To pass the I-forgot-to-write-it quiz, they had to earn a handout. Essentially, once they made a meaningful contribution, I handed them the handout. When I had zero handouts left, I knew everyone had contributed. And, I was stingy about what it took to earn a handout.
After class, I typed up their suggestions and posted it to blackboard. You can see it here.
I finished grading the exams today. In the official version of the exam I ended up expanding the voice leading portion to three very short progressions because I couldn’t test enough of the content I wanted to test with their suggestion. And, the writing about a favorite spot in the musical excerpt (the opening parallel period to the Clock movement of Haydn’s “Clock” Symphony) wasn’t optional. But the rest paralleled their very good suggestions.
The class averaged a B+ on the exam, which strikes me as too high, but I wouldn’t change a thing. No one bombed the exam, no one got everything perfect. (63.5 to 99 were the scores).
My biggest takeaway? I think my process worked because I had students emphasize skills, not content, as they thought about the exam. They understood how to review the content because they were preparing to demonstrate the skills…